← BACK TO INSIGHTS FEED

Eddie Smith (Bungie) exposes hidden labor costs of AI in game art pipelines

Summary
Eddie Smith, concept artist on the original Halo trilogy at Bungie, details how AI integration at the Las Vegas Sphere production added supervisory labor rather than replacing artists
His firsthand account contradicts the efficiency case for generative AI in visual pipelines: human art was required in every frame despite AI tooling
Core claim: AI amplifies directional dysfunction rather than solving it
"Unless you know what you're doing, AI is not going to help you. AI is going to help you not finish games even more."
— Eddie Smith, former Bungie artist
01

Sphere production proved AI added labor instead of cutting it

Smith worked on the Las Vegas Sphere "Wizard of Oz" staging, where AI was scoped to fill gaps from reformatting a 4:3 film for a 16K spherical screen
The team expected AI to handle the bulk of gap-fill work, a controlled use case that should have favored automation
Human-made art was still required in every frame
Manual touch-ups were as extensive as if humans had done the work from the start
AI added a supervisory layer on top of standard production labor rather than replacing it
"I got to see what the monster looked like up close... it was like The Wizard with the curtain pulled back. AI is not really that smart."
— Eddie Smith, former Bungie artist
02

Correction cycles consume senior talent, not junior hours

"I look at AI almost like a toddler, an extremely advanced toddler, who's just learned how to talk and obey standard instructions. But they're still a really small child and they constantly have to be reinforced and read."
— Eddie Smith, former Bungie artist
"Reinforced and read" demands the same experienced eye needed to direct human artists, applied at higher frequency
Studios pricing AI adoption on tool licensing alone are missing the senior hours consumed by correction cycles
03

Concept art is the highest-risk integration point

Mewgenics co-creator Tyler Glaiel called concept art "one of the worst" places to use AI, arguing that's where studios "want to be the most creative"
Larian embraced AI concept art for its new Divinity RPG, faced severe backlash, and reversed course entirely
Crimson Desert drew controversy over AI-generated concept art allegedly reaching the shipped game
Pattern across all three cases: AI at the creative vision layer produces downstream correction costs and reputational exposure that outweigh speed gains
04

AI accelerates directionless studios in the wrong direction

"All the problems that people have had in games and the reasons why they don't finish games, AI is not going to solve that. If you're the type of art director who doesn't know what they want, you still won't know what you want."
— Eddie Smith, former Bungie artist
Smith is not categorically anti-AI; he accepts it downstream of a strong, human-defined creative vision
"They're gonna get a rude awakening because I was already part of that process. I saw them go through that arc. I saw them realize, 'Oh, we're going to need to hire artists to do this.'"
— Eddie Smith, former Bungie artist
Events
Companies
Games
Locations
—

COMPILED BY

RELATED ARTICLES
EXPLORE MORE

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!